stat1 rabbit polyclonal ab (Cell Signaling Technology Inc)
Structured Review

Stat1 Rabbit Polyclonal Ab, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 6066 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/stat1 rabbit polyclonal ab/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 99 stars, based on 6066 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "P300/RNA polymerase II mediates induction of the teleost viral RNA sensor MDA5 through the interferon regulatory factor IRF11"
Article Title: P300/RNA polymerase II mediates induction of the teleost viral RNA sensor MDA5 through the interferon regulatory factor IRF11
Journal: The Journal of Biological Chemistry
doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2025.108193
Figure Legend Snippet: Lc MDA5 is regulated by Lc IRF11. A and B , LYCK cells (5 × 10 6 ) were treated with r Lc IFNi (250 ng/ml) (A) or transfected with poly(I:C) (15 μg) (B) at different time points. The mRNA and protein levels of Lc MDA5 were examined using qRT-PCR and Western blot. Relative mRNA expression levels were normalized to β-actin and presented as fold induction compared to control cells set at 1. C , cells were pretreated with either DMSO or ruxolitinib (10 μM) for 30 min, followed by exposure to r Lc IFNi (250 ng/ml) for 12 h. Lc STAT1 bound with pan-phos was analyzed through Co-IP assay with anti-pan phospho-serine/threonine antibody. D , following the treatments described in ( C ), the expression of Lc MDA5 was measured using qPCR. E , cells were treated with ruxolitinib for 30 min, followed by transfection with 15 μg of poly(I:C) for 24 h to assess Lc MDA5 expression. F , LYCK cells (1 × 10 7 ), pre-treated with either DMSO or ruxolitinib, were electroporated with 10 μg of Flag-tagged Lc IRF11 for 36 h. Subsequently, cells were treated with r Lc IFNi for 12 h, followed by cell lysis for Phos-tag SDS-PAGE analysis. The phosphorylated Lc IRF11 level was normalized to the total Lc IRF11 level. Please note that in Phos-tag SDS-PAGE, molecular weight estimations using molecular weight markers are not feasible. G , cells electroporated with 10 μg of Flag-tagged Lc IRF11 or Lc IRF1 plasmid for 48 h were harvested and subjected to qPCR analysis to assess Lc MDA5 expression. H , cells were transfected with siRNAs (100 nM of each siRNA) against Lc IRF11 or Lc IRF1 or with negative control siRNA (siNC). Forty eight hours later, cells were harvested and subjected to qPCR analysis. I and J , cells were transfected with indicated siRNAs for 24 h, followed by treatment with r Lc IFNi (250 ng/ml) for 12 h ( I ). Similar experiments were carried out, only replacing r Lc IFNi with poly(I:C) (15 μg; by transfection) ( J ). Harvested cells were analyzed by qPCR. Error bars represent mean ± SD from three biological replicates. ∗ p < 0.05, two-tailed unpaired Student's t test.
Techniques Used: Transfection, Quantitative RT-PCR, Western Blot, Expressing, Control, Co-Immunoprecipitation Assay, Lysis, SDS Page, Molecular Weight, Plasmid Preparation, Negative Control, Two Tailed Test
Figure Legend Snippet: Lc IRF11 regulates Lc MDA5 promoter activity through binding to its promoter via its DBD domain. A , sequence alignments of the ISRE motif in the promoter region of fish MDA5. B , diagram of the Lc MDA5 promoter reporter plasmids showing WT and mutant type (mut) ISRE motifs. C , poly(I:C)-induced activation of Lc MDA5 promoter activity. EPC cells (1 × 10 6 ) in 24-well plates were transfected with the Lc MDA5 promoter reporter (250 ng) and pRL-TK (25 ng) for 6 h, followed by transfection with 1250 ng of poly(I:C) for 24 h to assess luciferase activity. D , Lc IRF11 induced Lc MDA5 promoter activity. EPC cells were cotransfected with pRL-TK, Lc MDA5 promoter reporter, and either Lc IRF11, Lc STAT1 expression plasmids, or control plasmid (pCMV-FLAG). Luciferase activity was measured at 24 h later. E , activation of Lc MDA5pro-luc and its ISRE mutant ( Lc MDA5pro-mut) by Lc IRF11. EPC cells were cotransfected with expression plasmids of pRL-TK, Lc IRF11, and either Lc MDA5pro-luc or its mutant for luciferase activity assay. F , activation of Lc MDA5 promoter by Lc IRF11-WT, but not Lc IRF11-ΔDBD. EPC cells were cotransfected with expression plasmids of pRL-TK, Lc MDA5 promoter reporter, Lc IRF11-WT, Lc IRF11-ΔDBD, or control plasmid. Luciferase activity was measured at 24 h post-transfection. G , Lc IRF11 bound to Lc MDA5 promoter DNA via its DBD domain. HEK293T cells (1 × 10 7 ) were transfected with 10 μg of indicated plasmids. After 24 h, cell lysates were mixed with 100 ng of biotinylated Lc MDA5 promoter DNA. Protein–DNA interactions were analyzed by Western blot. H , ChIP analysis confirmed the binding of Lc IRF11 to the Lc MDA5 promoter. HEK293T cells (1 × 10 7 ) were cotransfected with Lc MDA5 promoter reporter and Flag-tagged Lc IRF11-WT or Lc IRF11-ΔDBD (5 μg each) for 24 h. Following transfection, protein-bound DNA was immunoprecipitated using an anti-FLAG Ab. Subsequently, ChIP-enriched DNA was quantified by qPCR. I , Lc IRF11 binds to the ISRE motif of the Lc MDA5 promoter. HEK293T cells were transfected with the indicated plasmids. After incubating the biotinylated Lc MDA5 promoter DNA, the interaction of protein–DNA was detected by Western blot. Data represent the mean ± SD from three biological replicates. Asterisks indicate statistical significance (∗ p < 0.05, two-tailed unpaired Student's t test).
Techniques Used: Activity Assay, Binding Assay, Sequencing, Mutagenesis, Activation Assay, Transfection, Luciferase, Expressing, Control, Plasmid Preparation, Western Blot, Immunoprecipitation, Two Tailed Test

